PENGARUH KUALITAS PELAYANAN LABORAN LABORATORIUMIPA TERHADAP TINGKAT KEPUASANSISWA

Studi Kasus SMA NEGERI 5 PURWOREJO

Authors

  • Umar Makhfudi Manajemen/13.12.00030

Keywords:

reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy, physical evidence

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether there is a positive and significant influence between the quality of service to the level of student satisfaction. In this study the quality of service includes reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy and physical evidence. Data collection techniques used are obervation techniques, interview techniques, questionnaires and documentation techniques. The population numbered 288 students and the number of seals 29 students or10% of the total population. The sampling technique used stratified random sampling, the data were analyzed by, simple linear regression, coefficient of determination and t test. Regression analysis results obtained a = 4.719 and b = 0.797 then the regress ion equation formed is Y = 4.719 + 0.797 X. The value of determination coefficient of 0.257 means that the influence of service quality to student satisfaction level is 25.7% and the remaining 74.3% affected Other factors beyond service quality include hardware, software, hardware quality, value-added software quality and learning process. Hypothesis testing can be proved there is apositive and significant influence between the quality of laboratory laboratory service laboratory to the satisfaction of students of SMA Negeri 5 Purworejo, so Ho is rejected and Ha accepted.

References

Assidiq, Abdul Kahfi. 2008Kamus Biologi, Yogyakarta: Panji Pustaka.Azwar. 1996. Menjaga mutu Pelayanan Kesehatan, Jakarta: Putaka Sinar Harapan.Arikunto, Sugiyono. 2005. Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.A.V. Feigenbaum, 1996.tistik untuk penelitian, Surakarta: sebelasMaret UniversityPress.Cardoso, P.T. 1995. Manajemen SumberDaya manusia Yogyakarta: AndiOffset.Donald R. Cooper dan C. William Emory. 2002. Metode Penelitian Bisnis.Jakarta: Erlangga.Ghozali, Imam, 2005, Analisis Multivariate dengan program SPSS, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.Hasibun, Malayu S.P.2005. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi revisi.Jakarta:Bumi Aksara.Mangkunegara, AA Anwar Prabu. 2007. Manajemen Sumber DayaManusia, BandungNuryani. 2005. Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Malang: IKIP Malang.Parasuraman, Valerie A. Zeithaml. Leonard Berry. 1985.A conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implication for Future Research. Journal of. Marketing, Volume 49. Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006.ProsedurPenelitian.PenerbitRinekaCipta.EdisirevisiVI.Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarata: BalaiPustaka.PopiSopiatin. 2010. Manajemen Belaja berbasis Kepuasan siswa. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.Rahmad, Jalaludin, 1989. Metode Penelitian Komunikasi. Bandung: Remadja Karya.Ratminto & A.S. Winarsih. 2007. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia.Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.Madiun Salirawati, D. 2009. Manajemen Pengelolaan Laboratorium.Singarimbun, Masri.1995. Metode Penelitian Survei. LP3S. Jakarta :Nanawi HadarSugiyono.2007. Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta. Sugiono, 2006, metode Penelitian Bisnis.Bandung: alfabeta.Sunarto, 2006, Pengantar Manajemen, Bandung: CV AlfabetaHandoko, Hani. 2001;4.Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber daya manusia. Yogyakarta.Tjiptono, Fandi, 2006, Manajemen Jasa, Yogyakarta: Andi OffsetUmar, Hussein. 1996. Metode Penelitian Untuk Skripsi dan Tesis Bisnis.Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.UU No 19 Tahun 2005. Standar Nasional Pendidikan. UU No 20 Tahun 2003. Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-31

How to Cite

Umar Makhfudi. (2018). PENGARUH KUALITAS PELAYANAN LABORAN LABORATORIUMIPA TERHADAP TINGKAT KEPUASANSISWA : Studi Kasus SMA NEGERI 5 PURWOREJO. Prospect : Jurnal Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 19(1), 256–269. Retrieved from https://journal.stiera.ac.id/index.php/PROSPECT/article/view/33