PENGARUH ECONOMIC VALUE ADDED(EVA) DAN MARKET VALUEADDED(MVA) TERHADAP KINERJA PERUSAHAAN (ROA) PADA PERUSAHAAN PERBANKAN YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA
Studi Empiris Perusahaan Perbankan Go Publicdi Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode Tahun 2020
Keywords:
Economic Value Added (EVA), Market Value Added(MVA), Company Performance / Return On AssetsAbstract
The aim of this research is to determine Economic Value Added (EVA), Market Value Added (MVA) and Return On Assets (ROA) in banking companies listed on the IDX for the 2020 period. The data collection technique used in this research method is literature study. The population in this study was 43 companies. In this research, researchers carried out samples to represent the population using simple random sampling, with a sample of 23 samples. This research explores and analyzes the independent and dependent variables consisting of Economic Value Added/EVA (X1), Market Value Added/MVA (X2) and Company Performance / Return On Assets (Y) which will be analyzed using multiple correlation analysis techniques, multiple regression , t test, f test and determination coefficient. In this research, the regression test obtained the equation ` Y = 0.605 + 1.213 X1 –6.558 X2. Where the constant is 0.605, which means that if Economic Value Added (EVA) and MVA are fixed (or 0), then ROA is 0.605. And if X1 or Economic Value Added (EVA) increases by one unit while X2 or MVA remains constant (or 0), then ROA will increase by 1.213. And if X1 or Economic Value Added (EVA) remains (or 0) while X2 or MVA increases by one unit, then ROA will decrease by 6.558. In the t test for Economic Value Added (EVA) it is known that the t count is 0.934 and the t table is 172472. So t count < t table then ho is accepted, so that the poor Economic Value Added (EVA) makes Economic Value Added (EVA) does not affect ROA. Meanwhile, for MVA, it is known that t count is -1.382 and t table is 1.72472, so t count < t table so ho is accepted. So MVA partially has no effect on ROA. In ANOVA, the results obtained for Economic Value Added (EVA) and MVA in this study showed that the calculated f was 3.029 and the f table was 2.59. So f table < f count then ho is rejected, so that Economic Value Added (EVA) and MVA simultaneously influence ROA. The Adjusted R Square figure (correlation figure squared or 0.4822) is 0.156. The Adjusted R Square number is also called the Coefficient of Determination. The coefficient of determination is 0.156 or equal to 15.6%. This figure means that the 15.6% ROA that occurs can be explained using the Economic Value Added (EVA) and MVA variables. The remaining 84.4% (100% -15.6%) must be explained by other causal factors such as Net Profit Margin, Return on Sales and Debt to Equity Ratio.
References
Agustina Wahyuni, Yuniarta Adi, dan Sinarwati Ni Gede. 2015. “Pengaruh Intellectual Capital, Corporate SocialResponsiabilitydan Good Angkoso, Nandi. 2006. Akuntansi Lanjutan.Yogyakarta: Penerbit FEAnis Chariri dan Imam Ghozali. 2003. Teori Akuntansi.Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.Djarwanto Ps. Pokok-pokok Analisis Laporan Keuangan Edisi Ke-2, cetakan ke2.BPFE_Yogyakarta:2014., hlm 14617 Eugene F. Brigham and Michael C. Enhardt, terjemahan Ali Akbar Yulianto, (2012:103) Ghozali,Imam. 2009. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Progam SPSS.Semarang : Badan Penerbit Universitas DiponegoroGhozali, Imam. 2011. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Progam IBM SPSS 19.Semarang : Badan Penerbit Universitas DiponegoroGitman, Lawrence J. 2003. “Principles of Manajerial Finance”. International Edition, 10thEdition. Pearson Education. BostonGolden R.B. 2002 .Sbu Strategy and Performance : The Marketing Effects Of The Corporate Sbu strategic manajemen journal 13.pp.145-158Harahap, Sofyan Safitri. 2005. Analisa Laporan Keuangan, buku 1.Jakarta: Salemba EmpatHarahap, Sofyan Safitri. 2008. Analisis Kritis Atas Laporan Keuangan.Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.Hendra S. Raharja Putra. 2009. Manajemen Keuangan dan Akuntansi untuk Eksekutif Perusahaan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.Hery. Analisis Kinerja Manajemen.PT Grasindo. Jakarta. 2014., hlm. 140 7 Husnan, Suad. 1998. Manajemen Keuangan Teori Dan Penerapan ( Keputusan Jangka Pendek Edisi Empat Buku Dua.Yogyakarta : BPFE-Yogyakartahttps://www.idx.co.id/perusahaan-tercatat/profil-perusahaan-tercatat/14 April 2021Kasmir, Manajemen Perbankan, Edisi Pertama, (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007) hal.27818
Kasmir. 2008. Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.Keomn, Scott, Martin, dan Petty. 2005. Manajemen Keuangan Prinsip-Prinsip dan Aplikasi.Jakarta: Pearson Education, inc.Mahduh M Hanafi & Halim. Analisis Laporan Keuangan. UPP STIM YKPN.Yogyakarta:2003 Mamduh Hanafi dan Abdul Halim. 2007. Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Edisi 3. Yogyakarta: Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen YPKN.Mulyadi, Akuntansi manajemen Edisi 3, Cetakan ke-3.Salemba Empat. Jakarta: 2001, hlm 415 2 Tika Pabundu. Budaya Organisasi dan Peningkat Kinerja Perusahaan. PT Bumi Aksara. Jakarta:2006, hlm. 12113Munawir. 2001. Akuntansi Keuangan dan Manajemen, Edisi Pertama. Yogyakarta: BPFE.Munawir, S. Analisis Laporan Keuangan Edisi 4. Penerbit Liberty. Yogyakarta: 2002, hlm:281Murjana, I Made, Financial Value Added: Paradigma Baru Pengukuran Kinerja dan Nilai Tambah Perusahaan, Jurnal Media Bina Ilmiah Mataram Volume 5 Nomor 8 Tahun 2011, hal. 62.36 Ni Luh Made dan Ni K. Leli. 2015. Pengaruh Rasio Likuiditas, Leverage, Operating Capacity, dan Sales Growth Terhadap Financial Distress. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana. ISSN: 2302-8556.Ningsih, Ayu Astrea. 2008. Analisis Pengaruh Rasio Profitabilitas, Solvabilitas, dan Aktivitas Terhadap Pertumbuhan Laba Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Jakarta Periode 2002-2005. Skripsi Universitas Muhamadiyah Surakarta. Website:http://eprints.ums.ac.id/5781/1. Diakses pada tanggal 12 April 2021.Pandia, Frianto.,”Manajemen Dana dan Kesehatan Bank:, (Jakarta : Rineka Cipta, 2012) hal.11319 Pratiwi, Yuni Eka. 2016. Proposal Skripsi Pengaruh Perputaran Modal Kerja dan Likuiditas Terhadap Rentabilitas (Study Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur PT. AhasimasFlat Glass Tbk Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Purworejo : STIE Rajawali.Simamora, Henry. 2000. Akuntansi: Basis Pengambilan Keputusan, Jilid Dua, Cetakan Pertama .Jakarta : Salemba EmpatSimarmata, EM. 2010. BAB II Tinjauan Pustaka Website:http://www.repositoy.usu.ac.id.pdf. Diakses pada tanggal 22 Juli 2016.Sugiyono. 2004. Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung : CV ALFABETASunariyah. 2006. Pengantar Pengetahuan Pasar Modal Edisi Kelima.Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.Sunyoto, Danang. 2013. Analisis Laporan Keuangan untuk Bisnis.Yogyakarta : CAPS (Center of Academic Publishing Service)Suratno, Ignatius Bondan, Economic Value Added: Dari Suatu Alat Penilai Kinerja Manajemen Menuju Konsep Pemerataan Pendapatan, Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia Volume IV Nomor 2 Tahun 2005, hal. 135.Suryani, “Analisis Pengaruh Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) terhadap profitasbilitas perbankan syariah di Indonesia”, Jurnal ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, Vol.9, No.1, (Mei 2011), hal.5522 Sutrisno. 2009. Manajemen Keuangan Teori, Konsep & Aplikasi. Yogyakarta : Ekonisia -FE UIISyamsudin, Lukman. 2000. Manajemen Keuangan.Jakarta : Raja Grafindo PersadaUmar, Husein. 1997. Riset Akuntansi. Jakarta : Gramedia Pustaka UtamaWarsono. Manajemen Keuangan Perusahaan. Banyu Media Publishing. Malang:2002, hlm.231Young, S. David dan Stephen O’Byrne (2001) Economic Value Added (EVA)dan Manajemen Berdasarkan Nilai: Panduan Praktis Untuk Implementasi, Diterjemahkan oleh Lusy Widjaya, Jakarta: Salemba Empat, tercantum dalam Hariadi, Indra, dkk., Penilaian Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan Berdasarkan Analisis Rasio Keuangan dan Economic Value Added (EVA)(Studi Pada PT Trikomsel Oke, Tbk dan PT Matahari Department Store, Tbk yang Terdaftar di BEI Periode 2009-2011), Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis Volume 5 Nomor 2 Tahun 2013, hal. 4.34
