PENGARUH WORK ENGAGEMENTTERHADAP KEPUASAN KERJA PADA PEGAWAI DI BADAN KEPEGAWAIAN DAN PENGEMBANGANSUMBER DAYA MANUSIA (BKPSDM)KABUPATEN PURWOREJO
Keywords:
work engagement, job satisfactionAbstract
This research aims to find out whether work engagement has a positive and significant effect on job satisfaction among employees at the Purworejo Regency Personnel and Human Resources Development Agency (BKPSDM). The data source uses a questionnaire. The population in this study were employees of the Purworejo Regency Personnel and Human Resources Development Agency (BKPSDM). The sampling technique used was saturated sampling and purposive sampling. The sample used was 50 people. The data analysis techniques used are simple correlation coefficient analysis, simple linear regression analysis, coefficient of determination, and t test. Based on the results and discussion in the previous chapter, it can be concluded that: the results of a simple correlation coefficient analysis show a Pearson correlation value of 0.584, meaning that there is a rather low relationship between work engagement and job satisfaction; the results of simple linear regression analysis show a constant value of 8.427, meaning that if work engagement is zero, then job satisfaction is 8.427, and the value of b = 0.177 means that if work engagement increases by one point then job satisfaction will increase by 0.177; The results of the coefficient of determination show an R2 value of 0.341. This means that work engagement contributes 34.1% to job satisfaction; The results of the t test show that the t value is greater than t table (4.989 > 1.677) or the sig value is (0.000 < 0.05), meaning that the work engagement variable has a positive and significant influence on job satisfaction so that the alternative hypothesis states that there is a positive and significant influence between work engagement on job satisfaction among employees at the Purworejo Regency Personnel and Human Resources Development Agency (BKPSDM) was accepted.
References
Arikunto, S. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.Armstrong, M. 2009. Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. London: Kogan Page.Citrayani, F., dkk. 2022. Pengaruh Karakteristik Pekerjaan dan Efikasi Diri terhadap Keterikatan Kerja dan Implikasinya terhadap Kepuasan Kerja. Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 7 (1): 225-240.George, J.M., dan Jones, G. 2012. Understanding and Managing Organizational Behavior. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.Ghozali, I. 2018. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan IBM SPSS 25. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.Griffin, R.W., dan Moorhead, G. 2014. Organizational Behavior: Managing People and Organizations. USA: South-Western, Cengage Learning.Khan, W.A. 1990. Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work. The Academy of Management Journal, 33 (4): 692-724.Kinicki, A., dan Fugate, M. 2016. Organizational Behavior: A Practical, Problem-Solving Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.Luthans, F. 2011. Organizational Behavior An Evidence-Based Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McShane, S.L., dan Glinow, M.A.V. 2018. Organizational Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.Mullins, L.J. 2010. Management & Organisational Behaviour. England: Pearson Education Limited.Murniati, M.P., dkk. 2013. Alat-alat Pengujian Hipotesis. Semarang: Penerbitan Unika Soegijapranata.
Qodariah, dkk. 2019. Effect of Work Engagement, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment to Employee Performance. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8 (2): 815-822.Ramos, A.O., dan Almeida, H.D. 2017. Work Engagement, Social Support, and Job Satisfaction in Portuguese Nursing Staff: A Winning Combination. Applied Nursing Research, 36: 37-41.Robbins, S.P., dan Judge, T.A. 2013. Organizational Behaviour. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.Robbins, S.P., dan Judge, T.A. 2017. Organizational Behavior. England: Pearson Education Limited.Santosa, T.E.C. 2012. Memahami dan Mendorong Terciptanya Employee Engagement dalam Organisasi. Jurnal Manajemen, 11 (2): 207-216.Schaufeli, W., dan Bakker, A. 2004. Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Utrecht University.Schaufeli, W.B., dkk. 2002. The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3: 71–92.Setiawan, S., dkk. 2017. Statistika II. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Bisnis (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.Sulistyo, A.R. 2017. Pengaruh Karakteristik Pekerjaan, Persepsi Dukungan Organisasi, dan Efikasi Diri terhadap Kepuasan Kerja dengan Keterikatan Kerja sebagai Variabel Intervening di Pusat Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan Bidang Seni dan Budaya Yogyakarta. Jurnal Publikasi. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Islam Indonesia.Sutrisno, E. 2019. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Prenamedia Group.Peraturan Bupati Purworejo Nomor 101 Tahun 2021 tentang Kedudukan, Susunan Organisasi, Tugas dan Fungsi, serta Tata Kerja Badan Kepegawaian dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Kabupaten Purworejo.Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara.
